Journal: Media Culture & Society, issue: January 2012; 34(1), Impact
factor: 1.092
The title of the journal says “Media Culture & Society” and the title itself
almost explain what the journal is about. This issue of the journal contains
different articles that has different standpoint in media. But it also has a very
strong standpoint in different culture and society and it talks about how media
in different ways has affected culture and our human behaviour. There was
one article (research paper) that I felt was the most interesting to me, and I
will talk about it more and analyze its theories. But this journal is not only for
the authors it is for all and has different forums where you can discuss what
authors have written and how they felt about it. They also provide major peer-
reviewed articles so they are of a high quality.
Article(research paper): The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-
generated content to professionally generated content - Kim.J (2012),
USA Collage of Saint Rose.
As the title of the Article says it’s about YouTube and how the big companies
like Warner changed the way it worked. This article had a lot of historical
facts about YouTube that was interesting to know. Things that made you
understand how much YouTube have helped the online streaming business
as well as the online video broadcasting business. But apart from that there
where some things I did not really feel was right. Some of the sentences and
part of this Article felt unfinished, like there was something missing. I thought
that the focus was more on statistic and revenues than the actual reason for
YouTube’s changes. The author could have mention more technological
reasons for YouTube’s changes and not only what the big media companies
“made” them do. But over all it followed the topic well and I could see how
you could make more articles from this article.
Briefly explain to a first year student what theory is, and what theory is
not.
A theory is a confirmed idea, or as some say is an idea that is accepted in the
research area in which the theory is presented. But there has been many
discussions on theory and that a lot of people use hypothesis when they
should use the word theory. In the paper “Nature of theory” the authors have
divided theories into different types that I think is useful. There are a total of
five theory type and I will try to explain theory more by listing these five types
and explain them briefly.
Theory for Analysis: What is it? Analyzes what is and does not explain
causality or try to predict generalization.
Theory for Explanation: What is, how, why when and where? Tries to explain
but does not try to predict anything in detail.
Theory for Prediction: What is and what will be. This is what “Explanation” is
not, it tries to predict with precision but doesn’t necessarily have to explain it.
Theory for Explanation and Prediction(EP): Is almost a combination of the
second and third types. Some say it should not be combined but these
authors decided to use it because of their papers focus.
Theory for Design and action: How to do something. Gives detail explanation
on how to construct a specific thing or artefact.
Describe the major theory or theories that are used in your selected
paper. Which theory type (see Table 2 in Gregor) can the theory or
theories be characterised as?
I cannot say that the paper I chose had a specific theory but if I would but a
theory type on it, it would probably be Theory for Analysis. As explained
above the text try to tell us about YouTube’s history and tries to analyze the
changes that has happened and why it has happened.
Which are the benefits and limitations of using the selected theory or
theories?
The benefits are that you can control it and not be confused on what you are
supposed to write. It will almost be a guideline for you to follow and even if
your theory is not clear to begin with it will be in the end if you have selected
one to use. The limitations, as with almost everything, is that it is hard to
change theory when you’ve started to use on and if changed it could
complicated what you have already done and what you will do.
References:
Kim.J, The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-
generated content to professionally generated content (2012),
USA Collage of Saint Rose.
Journal: Media Culture & Society, issue: January 2012; 34(1), Impact
factor: 1.092
Gregor.S, The nature of theory (2006) AUSTRALIA, The Australian national
University
Hey Anna :).
SvaraRaderaInteresting choice of paper about YouTube. I'm wondering though how the big companies changed the website, what the causes are, instead of being the users themselves which I would have thought? Maybe that's what you meant though about the lack of technological reasons. Nonetheless, it's an interesting study because I do agree about YouTube helping the online streaming business, early displaying the advantages about streaming media and thus allowing other services to be formed.
Thanks for that comment I'll try to answer the questions you have about it. Well, the big companies changed it because they put legal pressure on YouTube to change. A lot of the companies thought that the laws and regulations was not followed completely by YouTube and that is why we have the YouTube we have today. And the users have not just been happy about the changes so of course regular users like you and me, have pressured YouTube to stay as "open" ass possible to us. Hope that made it a bit clearer for you else I would refer you to actually read the text(If you got time) it actually had a lot of interesting history on YouTube, things I did not know before.
Radera